User:Eshah888/Virtual reality therapy/Bibliography

You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.

Outline of proposed changes
Click on the edit button to draft your outline.

Lead
Introductory Sentence: The article opens with a clear definition of Virtual Reality Therapy, mentioning its various names and its application in psychological and occupational therapy. This introductory sentence effectively sets the stage for understanding the broad scope of VRT.

Brief Description: The lead section provides a concise overview of VRT's purpose, its technological basis, and its clinical applications, including its effectiveness in treating PTSD, aiding in physical rehabilitation, and its role in treating other conditions, such as body dysmorphia and autism. It might be useful if it outlined the major sections to come for improved clarity. Overall, it gives readers a well-rounded introduction to the topic.

Additional (Unnecessary) Information: The lead sticks to summarizing content that is elaborated upon in article's body. This follows the guideline that it should not introduce much more new information.

Conciseness: The lead is concise, packing a significant amount of information into a few paragraphs without overwhelming the reader with too much detail. It might, however, slightly veer towards being detailed for readers seeking the most basic information.

Article body
Relevance: The content of the article directly relates to VRT, covering its application, history, technology, advantages, and limitations. It appears to thoroughly address the topic's relevance.

Up-To-Date Information: The article includes references to recent studies and technological advancements, suggesting that the content is pretty up-to-date. However, the rapidly evolving nature of VRT means that continuous updates will be necessary for maintaining its relevance.

Missing Content: The article seems comprehensive, but ensuring it covers the latest VR hardware advancements and the most recent clinical trials would further improve its completeness. Additionally, a significant factor that is missing from the article is the cost factor. For more detail, it would also be beneficial to add data and statistics about its accessibility and effectiveness to various populations, considering factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and geographical location. There should also be a greater emphasis on regulatory approvals and standards.

Equity Gaps: The article touches on VRT's applications across various populations, including military veterans with PTSD and individuals with autism, suggesting an awareness of equity. However, this could be enhanced by specifically addressing access issues or disparities in the availability of VRT. Its availability and use across different socio-economic groups and geographic locations would bridge any gaps left in the article relating to equity.