User:Esjohnso2022/Limonia hardyana/NoelaniV Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Esjohnso2022


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Esjohnso2022/Limonia hardyana - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Limonia hardyana - Wikipedia

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you? The environmental risks to species topic was interesting.. It is kind of upsetting to think that changes in the environment can cause a species of animal to be gravely affected.
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way? The physical description topic described the species, but perhaps you could elaborate more on its appearance. Coloration? How big does it get, or its common length? and other things like that (only if this information is available, if its not then its okay). I was trying to get a copy of a picture of my flightless crane fly but everything was copy wrighted.  I did try to describe it better though by describing the illustration i found.
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? No.
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? Yes.
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes, but the last reference does not have a link to view the source.. That last source was found in a reference library section online for UH.  It did not have a associated link but I will search around.
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources? They are good, considering that this species is rare and seems that not much information is available for it.
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article?
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement? Adding more citations to statements and sentences, reference links, and more information in some topics will improve the article. This is because it will provide the reader with more information, rather than short phrases and words that they would have to search for a definition. Additionally, you should add a Lead to briefly introduce the organism. Great feedback and I will do more research on the greater family that the flightless crane fly comes from.
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? No, it is not. What I mentioned above is what the author could improve on.
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Adding a lead section, reference links and citations, overall improving the flow of the article, and more information in some sections. I added what I could find.
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? I could also add more information in some of the sections in my article and citations. (I also only wrote some short phrases and left a topic blank.)