User:Esmith75/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Pentagram (design firm)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This is my article that I have chosen for my class assignment. It is an article about the design firm Pentagram. It looks like the information that is already in the article is correct and helpful, but the article is not very long and could probably be expanded.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section of this article is concise and doesn't provide any information that isn't present in the article. It very briefly previews each section of the article, and could probably be extended without becoming overly detailed. The content in this article is relevant to Pentagram and is up-to-date. There is no content that is missing or that does not belong. However, some of the sections of the article, like the history section, are quite brief. This article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. The article is written from a neutral point of view and there are no heavily biased claims. There are no viewpoints that are misrepresented and the article does not try to persuade the reader in favor of any position. The facts in the article are back up by secondary sources of information that are mostly current, although they seem to be mostly from news coverage. The links work with the exception of a couple of the oldest ones that haven't been archived. The article is well-written and organized with no grammatical errors and the sections make sense. The article only includes one image of the former Pentagram building in Manhattan despite there being multiple current studios. The caption is somewhat irrelevant. However it does adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations and is placed relevantly. The talk page had not been updated in years until it became a part of my school assignment. There are talks of why the article is notable enough to remain on Wikipedia and how to improve the article, but they are from quite a while ago. In conclusion, this article has information that is relevant, it just hasn't been expanded upon as much as possible. It could be further developed.