User:Estrella-Arcoiris/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * World Association of Sign Language Interpreters World Association of Sign Language Interpreters


 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead section provides a concise overview.
 * Content provided is very minimal, seems content is missing.
 * The article is neutral.
 * There are few resources provided.
 * The article is concise, with external links provided to support citing.
 * As I am new to wiki I am curious about the minimal information provided on the article. The talk page states this article is a wikiproject.


 * Sources
 * http://wasli.org/about/history
 * http://terptree.co.uk/uncategorized/what-is-wasli/
 * http://wasli.org/

Option 2

 * Article title Sign language Sign language
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead section of the article is concise with detailed information about the topic.
 * The content provided in the article is relevant with main and sub ideas. The content addresses topics related to historically underrepresented populations.
 * The tone and balance of the article reads as neutral.
 * The article is supported by many sources and references. The sources are current and from a variety of authors.
 * The article is well organized and easy to read. The article is broken down into various topics with clearly identifiable headings.
 * The article uses a diverse selection of images and videos.
 * The talk page shows this article is a course assignment through wiki edu. The talk page shows a lot of member engagement.
 * The talk page shows this article is a course assignment through wiki edu. The talk page shows a lot of member engagement.


 * Sources
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/26204860
 * https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=eb0cb2ac-7045-40fe-8bcf-a40b2c534003

Option 3

 * Article title
 * ASL interpreting ASL interpreting


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article has a lead section below the table of contents. The lead section provides detailed information about the topic.
 * The content is relevant to the topic. Code of ethics is outdated, as the NAD-RID currently have Code of Professional Conduct.
 * The sources and references provided are limited.
 * The article is well organized with sections that are broken down throughout the article.
 * The article did not include any images or videos.
 * The talk page showed minimal communication threads with contributors.


 * Sources
 * https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:154885ef-2f50-3664-ba5e-f9654c395ddf#pageNum=1

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Language interpretation Language interpretation


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's lead section describes the topic, not in a clear to understand way.
 * The content is relevant.
 * The article provides sources, however there is not a robust list.
 * The article is well organized in the way of breaking down sections in easy to read headings.
 * The article has images about the topic.
 * The talk page show limited interaction with page members.


 * Sources
 * https://web.archive.org/web/20141224151850/http://www.rid.org/interpreting/new_to_interpreting/index.cfm/AID/61

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Video relay service Video relay service


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article provides a concise and detailed lead section.
 * The content in the article appears up to date and relevant. The article mentions underrepresented populations such as the deaf community.
 * The article is neutral. The article presents facts, dates.
 * The article list many resources to support the facts presented. Sections without sources are clearly identified.
 * The sources provides come from a variety of authors.
 * The article is well organized. Sections are broken down and clearly labeled.
 * The article includes images.
 * There is some engagement on the talk page.


 * Sources
 * https://web.archive.org/web/20050217060701/http://www.deafcouncil.org.uk/ccvisp.htm
 * https://www.canada.ca/en/radio-television-telecommunications/news/2017/11/video_relay_servicenowavailabletodeafcanadians24hoursaday7daysaw.html
 * Keep in Mind
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.