User:EstricPolearm/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Muluku.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it relates to African mythology (an interest of mine) and because Muluku is the creator god of a religion in Mozambique, making him important in that context. My initial impressions are poor: the article is only one paragraph in length and has no citations, so I am expecting this page to not check many of the boxes to follow.

Evaluate the article
As for the lead section, the introductory sentence gives a good overview, but that is all. It is not concise and gives a summary, rather than an overview, of Muluku.

Regarding content, the content is relevant to the topic, but it is not up to date, having only one edit in the past decade. Much content is missing about this deity, but it does regard underrepresented populations, being centered around a Mozambican mythology. Overall, the article needs much more detail around the events it covers and on other events.

The article is largely neutral in tone and balance, though it centers almost exclusively around the god's creation of mankind and does not mention any other events relating to him.

Sources and citations are completely absent from this article. Facts have no sources to support them.

As for organization and writing quality, grammar style is nonchalant and structure is lacking. There are no spelling errors, but grammar is awkward and dubious in parts.

Images and media are completely absent from this article.

The article's talk page has no discussion, but it is part of the WikiProjects for both Africa and for Mythology. It is a stub in both WikiProjects and is of mid-importance in WikiProject Mythology.

Overall, this article is very short and underdeveloped, and what is present is not remarkable. Its only particular strength is that it gives a good overview of the myth it covers, relating to Muluku. This article suffers from lack of effort and needs attention to grow before it can deeply improve, but adding sources and additional sections is a good start.