User:EstricPolearm/Unkulunkulu/LunaRavenrose Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(EstricPolearm)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:EstricPolearm/Unkulunkulu - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
LEAD: the lead has a good introduction sentence; however, it does not have a brief description of the article so that could be added in even if it's just a sentence or two describing what the article contains. The lead could use some more details as well its very basic.

CONTENT: as far as the content goes, I think they are doing a good job it could use more details as its very basic. (I know its incomplete so I am sure more will be added) the writing is good it leads me to want to read more and get more information on the subjects, so I think if you go into further details of the "how" and the "why" it would really give the reader what they are looking for.

TONE AND BALANCE: I have no critique for this one because they did an excellent job staying neutral.

SOURCES AND REFERENCES: the sources and references appear to be good they used a wide range of sources. A good idea would be to pull as much information from the sources as possible.

ORGANIZATION: So far, the article seems well organized, I didn't notice any grammar or spelling errors, The writing is clear, separated into sections of major points of the article.

IMAGES AND MEDIA: no images have been added to the article yet.

FOR NEW ARTICLES: I am unsure if this is a new article, and I don't know how to tell the difference, but they appear to me to be following/have all the guidelines this suggests.

OVERALL IMPRESSIONS: overall I think this article has a strong start, it is well written so far. like I mentioned it could use more details but I'm sure they will add them as its incomplete. I think they are doing a great job so far and I enjoy what i read so far it made me want to learn more so that's fantastic.