User:Et8872rp/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Eyewitness memory

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this because part of my topic is focused on eyewitness testimonies and memory and how inaccurate they can be. This matters because someone who is remembering things that didn't actually happen can put innocent people in prison.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article is rated a high-value of importance and has a quality check of B. It talks a lot about all the different reasons someones memory may be inaccurate and our brain remembering or seeing things that may have not happened. It is well organized and well written. It has good examples of each topic that can cause false memory like stress and trauma. It seems to have a neutral tone when talking about all the types of eyewitness memory. The article does have an outline on the side to help find what you might be looking for since there is a lot of information on this page as well. I think the article could have more studies added into the different methods to strengthen the work shown instead of just saying "studies have shown." There are planned improvements in the talk page to help strengthen the article more, but the article does talk about a lot of important things.