User:Et8872rp/Eyewitness memory/KalleyO Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Et9972rp


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Loftus, E. F. (2018). Eyewitness Science and the Legal System. Annual Review of Law & Social Science, 14, 1–10.
 * Daisuke, S., Matsui, H., & Yuji, I. (2022). False memory for faces is produced by the deese-roediger-McDermott paradigm based on the morphological characteristics of a list: Research and reviews. Current Psychology, 41(5), 3247-3257.
 * Georgiadou, K., Chronos, A., Verschuere, B., & Sauerland, M. (2022). Reaction time-based concealed information test in eyewitness identification is moderated by picture similarity but not eyewitness cooperation. Psychological Research, 86(7), 2278-2288.

<references group="Loftus, Elizabeth F. (2018-10-13). &quot;Eyewitness Science and the Legal System&quot;. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 14 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-030850. ISSN 1550-3585. Shimane, Daisuke; Matsui, Hiroshi; Itoh, Yuji (2022-05-01). &quot;False memory for faces is produced by the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm based on the morphological characteristics of a list&quot;. Current Psychology. 41 (5): 3247–3257. doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00830-0. ISSN 1936-4733. Georgiadou, Katerina; Chronos, Agatha; Verschuere, Bruno; Sauerland, Melanie (2022-10-01). &quot;Reaction time-based Concealed Information Test in eyewitness identification is moderated by picture similarity but not eyewitness cooperation&quot;. Psychological Research. 86 (7): 2278–2288. doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1139-8. ISSN 1430-2772. PMC 9470627. PMID 30635707" />
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 *  Lead 
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? the lead does include and introductory sentence and is is concise and to the point and it describe the articles topic well.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? There is a nice article body paragraph that gives a description about what he is going to talk about
 *  Body 


 * Is the content added up-to-date? According to the sources that are given and the references, the content is up to date as of 2022. That is really recent information that can be added to this page.
 * Is the content added neutral? yes the content that will be added is in a neutral tone and can be easily read.


 * Organization
 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The content is very well-written and is clear and concise. you can tell exactly what is going to be added to the content of the page
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? There is no grammatical errors or spelling errors in the content that is added


 *  Overall 
 * How can the content added be improved? Overall this is a great start to adding to this wikipedia page. You can always add more stuff to this outline and polish it in class like we are doing for the next couple of weeks but great start Ryan!