User:Etaolive2256/Donlin Gold mine/Foxstronautilus Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Etaolive2256


 * Link to draft you're reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Etaolive2256/Donlin_Gold_mine?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Donlin Gold mine

Evaluate the drafted changes
The paragraph is relevant to the Donlin Gold Mine and I think it is very important to mention, so it's a great addition to the article. It stays on topic, while you also mentions the context and external factors. The tone seems neutral and I did not find any bias towards any sides.

The subtitle of your paragraph is "Local controversy", which you explain well in the first sentences. Although I feel like "Controversy" would be enough for the subtitle, especially since you explain later that it's not widespread information.

You provide plenty sources and they are formatted correctly, however you could also hyperlink some terms such as "Environmental impact statement" or "Clean Water Act", since they already have a connecting wikipedia page. The already existing sources are relevant. I also didn't find any information that is out of date.

In the middle, there is the sentence: "The levels of dissolved mercury in freshwater, as defined by the Alaska Water Quality standards is 1.4 μg/l for...". I think you don't have to explain the exact measurements, just mention that there are specific standards that were or weren't met.

Overall it is a great addition so far with a lot of sources.