User:Ethanstashek/Trench fever/0703jiveyjane Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ethanstashek


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ethanstashek/Trench fever


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Trench fever

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

You have added a lot of good information, however the Epidemiology portion could be better broken up into sections that relate to different trends so as to elaborate on the person, place, and time trends often examined with diseases.

It is unclear why there is an entire history section, however if the intention is to add that to a different area of the article (not under epidemiology) it looks great but needs citations. We do not think it would fit well under the epi section.

Sources 4 and 5 are not properly placed in the epidemiology section of your draft. They need to be added to the proper sentences you referenced them for.

This draft is well written and contains valuable information. The info is also neutral and contains no grammatical errors that we could see. Well done.