User:EtherealPink/Reflective listening/KhaleesiArya Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

EtherealPink


 * Link to draft you're reviewing /Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Reflective listening

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead introduces the topic concisely and clearly. It is objective and defines the concept well. Introducing the concept of Fisher’s Model in the lead would be a great addition. The information in the lead regarding Carl Rogers is a great touch of additional information, however it can be delved into further in a later section.

Fisher’s Model is a well thought out and articulated explanation. The use of bullet points helps to break up large blocks of text. There is a section being worked on to add additional content and the topic shows an in depth look into the subject. The article itself does not reflect historically underrepresented populations, however the Additional Application section would be a great opportunity to discuss the implementation of reflective listening in therapeutic settings of diverse backgrounds.

The content is neutral and there was no bias I could detect. I do believe some of the topics from the lead can be brought down further into the article. There are some sections obviously under construction but I anticipate those following the same format. The article itself is straightforward and clinical regarding the topic, which is how it should be.

The sources and citations are the biggest issue with the page as it currently stands. There are many sections and statements with “citation needed,” so focusing on sourcing the material will be the biggest overhaul this article will need. Sources that are there have working links. The sources are all from peer reviewed journals and well established resources.

The new topics being created in the Sandbox add a lot of background and depth to the article that wasn’t there before.

Overall, I think the article is coming along great. The topic is accurately and thoroughly explained with added information to round out the subject. The new information delves into common uses of the subject and the situations in which it is applicable.