User:Ethic Factor1/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Vastaamo)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

The article's content is relevant to the topic raised in this course. My preliminary impression on this article is that there seems to be not enough information written about this incident.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is it written neutrally? Yes, it is written neutrally.
 * Does each claim have a citation? Yes
 * Are the citations reliable? Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

There seems to be content missing. The article is not well-developed. The article can be improved by providing more detailed information about the incident. There is no talk page discussion.