User:Etholn/Electrochemical aptamer-based biosensors/Aromatic Thiol Peer Review

General info
Etholn, GurkiratSinghNijjar
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Etholn/New sandbox
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Electrochemical aptamer-based biosensors

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

A lead doesn't seem to have been added. Since the original article doesn't have a lead, including one would be a great addition.

Content:

I like the new section in 'Practical Applications'. It is relevant to the topic and keeps the article up-to-date. I would love to see a few more applications; in its current state, the paragraph preceding Clinical applications seems to already describe clinical applications - which makes the section seem redundant.

The 'Limitations' section is off to a good start. This is a great addition to the article. However I am noticing a few grammatical/contextual errors. For example, you might be missing an apostrophe in "... a change in the aptameter ' s conformation". Also, did you perhaps mean "signal-to-noise ratio" instead of "signal ratio"?

Tone:

Topic is neutral and not biased towards any side!

Images and Media:

The original article only has two small images. A few more additions would elevate the article. A mix of diagrams and photos that further describe E-AB biosensors would be fantastic.

Overall impressions:

I find the topic of E-AB biosensors really interesting! I did not know such a thing existed. As such, I wanted to know a bit more about the development history of this instrument. Who made it? Is it patented? When was it first made? The tone of the article seems a little technical, but I was able to understand it with multiple readings. Maybe some overall minor edits to the article to make it more user-friendly would be great. That way, somebody with limited scientific knowledge would be able to understand it better. Great job!