User:Eunim0713/Cervical thymic cyst/Dm0507 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Eunim0713


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Eunim0713/sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cervical thymic cyst

Lead[edit]
The lead has not been updated

Content[edit]
The content is relevant to the topic, and concise. The headings break it down in a logical manner. While the content is well written, it is at a somewhat higher reading level. I would suggest trying to substitute common medical terminology for more simple terms. For example, instead of saying dyspnea or dysphagia, you could instead say trouble breathing or swallowing.

Tone and Balance[edit]
The tone is mostly neutral, with statements generally surrounding fact. It does not attempt to persuade the reader, which is a good thing.

Sources and References[edit]
The sources are appropriately cited, however only a few studies are from within the last 5 years. I would suggest adding some more recent sources if possible.

Organization[edit]
The organization is logical, starting with the pathogenesis and progresses into features and ultimately treatment. I would suggest maybe creating subheadings within diagnosis to further improve organization. For example one sub-heading could be about differential diagnoses, another could say imaging workup, and you could have one to discuss any important labs for workup.

Images and Media[edit]
No images or media included in the article

Overall Impression[edit]
This is a great draft, with succinct and informative material. I think with some improved organization and some vocabulary changes, this would be a very strong article!