User:Evanderford/sandbox

Article evaluation
The article that I evaluated was a biographical page on Margaret Jane Benson. Everything in the article seemed relevant; as such, nothing distracted me from the topic at hand. Benson died in 1936, so nothing in the article seems out of date (unless some new anthology of English botanists has been published of which I am unaware).

One of the things that could have been improved in the article is better, more robust citation. The statement that Benson was published in Annals of Botany and New Phytologist has a citation, but the link only leads to an Encycopedia Brittanica article about Fagales that does not mention Benson at all.

Another thing that could help the article is a bit more length. Granted, there may not be much source material about Margaret Jane Benson, but the article is very brief.

This article does not have any conversations on its talk page, which I found quite interesting. The article is rated as a stub, which is in line with my expectations. The page is a part of three different WikiProjects - Project Biography (Science and Academia), Women's History, and Women Scientists.

This page seems pretty similar to the way that we talk about women scientists in class, but there is not as much detail or context.