User:Evanleach33/Evaluate an Article

Australopithecus Afarensis Wiki Evaluation:

-for the most part the article appears to stay on topic throughout the majority of the sections and paragraphs. I could potentially see myself getting lost in the different names of archaeologists who made important discoveries with this ancient human but other than that it flows well.

-possibly out of date information regarding the tools and technology that Afarensis had. Also some information about how these people went extinct would improve the quality of the article.

-this article seems heavily neutral, aside from a few theories that are intertwined with Afarensis but even those seem to be talked about in a very neutral manner.

-this article appears to be incredibly accurate dense with information from a variety of sources, it seems for the most part that all of the links I click on have accurate and reliable websites and databases to cite from. Some academic journals and well received books regarding this topic were used throughout this article as well. Each paragraph or idea is properly cited and there are a total of 69 different sources used.

-the talk page to this article appears to have been very busy over the last couple decades. The first thing you see when you get to the page is some hostility between two editors arguing about the best way to write out certain phrases. Aside from a few debates and small arguments, most of the entries on this page are really just here to generate conversation and talk about certain theories and ideas.

-it is rated a C-Class Article and a level 5 vital article, it is also of interest to these projects

“Wikiproject Africa/Ethiopia”

“Wikiproject Paleontology”

“Wikiproject Anthropology”

”Wikiproject Primates”