User:EvelynnHu/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Louder than Word: Galaxy Award (Japan)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. The reason for this is that I’m interested in advertising and something about Japan communication.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Not so clear
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Over detailed

Lead evaluation
the introduction is a little bit over detailed but the content it clear for people to understand.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?no
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? The writer just gives a few parts of the topic.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No

Content evaluation
the author separates the topic in four parts and provides explanation for each elements of the topic.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? It is neutral
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, this article just provides the information about the topic.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?yes
 * Are the sources current?no
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?no
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation
The reference is close to the content and topic perfectly. They are straight forward to understand and relative to the article.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?no
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes, this page is pretty organized and even given about the translation in Japanese.

Organization evaluation
overall, the article is great to read and can understand most of the content. The author separates in two parts- television and radio. All the reference are working.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions
 * Here is no images in this article


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
It need to add some image and media for this award for people watch and have a better understanding about this awards instead of searching the awards on the other webs.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?Yes
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It just related about communication awards.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? The Wikipedia includes all the information and links to other areas.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Introduce the Galaxy Awards in Japan.
 * What are the article's strengths? The classification is clear and the examples that author given are reasonable.
 * How can the article be improved? It need to add some image and media for this award for people watch and have a better understanding about this awards instead of searching the awards on the other webs.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? yes

Overall evaluation
Overall, it is a good article that it makes each point clear and understanding and all the links work well. The this that need to improve are add some images and examples.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: