User:Evyn08/Adobe Lightroom/Hmk0110 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Evyn08
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Evyn08/Adobe Lightroom

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I think at least the second paragraph can be slightly shorten down.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
I think you did a good job of clarifying some of the vague terms and details. One thing that was confusing for me was the "Lightroom is not a file manager like Adobe Bridge. It cannot operate on files unless they are first imported into the Lightroom database and only in recognized image formats, which includes TIFF, JPEG, PSD(Photoshop), PNG, CMYK (edited in RGB color space) and raw image formats are supported" this part in particular. I think listing the files that are acceptable in Adobe Lightroom was helpful to celerity from the original version. However, changing the wording of "Lightroom is not a file manager" would be helpful for the readers, since it's technically managing photo files in the software.