User:EwanTCB/Neuroconstructivism/Christian.pompa Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:EwanTCB


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:EwanTCB/Neuroconstructivism


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Neuroconstructivism

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The changes made so far add a decent amount of substantial information to the article. Citations are placed when needed, little to no grammatical errors were made and the structure of the article is really good. The information added is clearly neutral and gained from credible sources. I think you could elaborate on a few things here and there but overall, this article is looking good so far