User:EwanTCB/Neuroconstructivism/Kuhiria Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

EwanTCB, Sumayauser123, Adrian.JAC


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EwanTCB/Neuroconstructivism?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Neuroconstructivism

Evaluate the drafted changes
The users proposed adequate sources to statements that were perhaps not properly referenced. Some of the added references could be much better in terms of quality and content. For example, some of the websites referenced have domains that are too generic (.com), they are not necessarily up to date (some date to 1997), and there are no signs that some are peer reviewed. In other words, some sources might need to be improved to increase trustworthiness. On other thing about some of the referenced articles is that they sometimes contain a single author. This decreases the reliability of the information because a single person is more prone to say inaccurate information, whereas multiple authors will collectively work on the research and correct mistakes or inaccuracies along the way.

Aside from this, references seem generally fine. The next step would be to perhaps include these references in a neutral and fluent way in the sandbox draft.