User:Ewoodman/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Sexuality after spinal cord injury

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because I wasn't aware that people with spinal cord injuries were able to engage in intercourse and be satisfied. I understand that it is a large misconception amongst the public that people with any kind of disability cannot have satisfying sex lives. I remember learning about rehabilitation for people with disabilities, but I don't recall learning about sexual function.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is very concise and does a great job clearly explaining the content of this article. It was brief but included everything they would touch on in the article.

The content in this article covers each subtopic equally, with a neutral tone and very good references. References consisted of journal articles, peer reviewed research articles, and this article also referenced other Wikipedia pages. Each subtopic is covered equally, one does not hold more weight than another.

This article only had a few photos, but there wasn't a need for many photos. Important things that needed images to help further understanding were included.

In the talk page we can see there are many edits to remove unnecessary imagery throughout the article. Some conversations revolved around corrections to some ableist terms that were used, and clarifying some sexuality terms as well. Most of the talk page consists of correcting terminology and rephrasing.

Overall, I think this was a very well-developed article. It was detailed, concise, and referenced reliable and valid sources. I think the images used throughout the article could be a bit bigger, as I had trouble seeing them and had to zoom in.