User:ExclusiveEditor/pandg/rough

What Wikipedia is not

 * Size decision - based on comparison with paper, print encyclopedia- for short, static articles - NO (WP:NOTPAPER)

Inculsion or not?

 * Two subjects (kind of homonyms) in one article - Not exactly prohibited. (WP:DICTIONARY)
 * Available only definition - NO. (WP:DICTIONARY)
 * Accepted knowledge - and accepted interpretations of everything. (Learned)

Minor views (Incl. Images and Juxtaposition)

 * Add or not? - Weight of information -  NOT based on prominence between editors or readers - but prevalence in reliable sources. (Note at WEIGHT)
 * Reference the majority viewpoint in minority article- and minority avoid mention in main article, per the ratio - based on sources & support for view. (WEIGHT)

General

 * Content that quickly obsolete (no longer useful) - strive to avoid. (NOTOPINION)
 * To note that - Userpages - talks not strict - use WP:UP and WP:UPYES.

Questions
How do you reason out if a piece of information is exposition per WP:NOTEVERYTHING or an appropriately long summary.