User:EzEdit/sandbox

The references in this article are terrible. 2, 3, 5 & 6 aren't references at all. Neither 8, 9 or 10 support what they are cited against. 12 and 13 lead to blank pages. 14 leads to the contents page of an online beer drinkers forum. Should we delete the content relying on those references?


 * 2, 3, 5 and 6 are notes, not references. Not sure what you consider the problem to be here.

12 leads to a page with a redirect to the content. You may want to look into upgrading your browser. I've updated the link.


 * They don't provide verification, but may mislead folk into thinking they do. The "notes" need references then, or what's to stop anyone putting any bullshit on the end of one?


 * 13 took a couple of minutes longer to track down the new url.


 * 14 Correct page in beer drinkers forum found with my first google search. Updated.


 * 8 I believe the intent was for the search function on the website to be used, as there are multiple documents available that support this citation. I think the site reference is more useful than any particular pdf; I've updated the citation.


 * 9 is the French-language version of that site.


 * 10 and 11 were introduced at the same time as 8 and 9; they appear to be superfluous. I've removed them and combined the other two cites into one.