User:Ezafft1/Treasury of Atreus/Steelcaveman Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Esafft1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ezafft1/Treasury_of_Atreus?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Treasury of Atreus

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

In the lead descriptions lean heavier into opinioned language so maybe remove "grandeur" from the last sentence of the lead. Also, some more of the lead should be cited as to where the information of sharing in Bronze Age Mycenean architecture comes form.

The amount of contribution to the structure section is very significant. It has a very high weight and I am of the opinion that it should be more well shown in the lead and more prominent earlier in the article so that the article doesn't feel as back loaded. Try not to use the generic plural some and the opinioned phrase "stolen" in the Structure section about the sections of the columns being removed by Lord Elgin.

The article is very strong with good references and well detailed in the structure. The history of tholos is well preserved and your contributions are well developed.