User:Ezanaa.yo/Solar cell/User5843 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Username: Ezanaa.yo


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ezanaa.yo/Solar_cell?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Solar cell

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
The article lead provides an in-depth description of the topic and is led by a strong introductory sentence that clearly states the article's topic. Since this article body is a new addition to the article, it should be included in the lead.

Content
The content added to the article body is relevant to the Solar Cell article, and a good addition for applications of the solar cell within the article. Since the article body is only a short paragraph now, followed by subsections without provided information, it would be beneficial to find relevant sources for a few of the outlined subsections to provide readers with a better understanding of the topic. All of the information currently added is up to date. I believe it would also be beneficial to further expand on the existing draft, including expanding upon how the multiple input factors described in the last sentence of the article body affect the output power of solar cells.

Tone and Balance
The information provided in the section draft was conveyed in a balanced manner and unbiased tone. The information is reflective of the sources provided, and does not attempt to persuade readers in favour of a particular viewpoint.

Sources and References
All content added in the article draft was relevant to the topic and supported with articles from peer-reviewed journals, indicating reliable sources. The content reflects the information provided in the sources well, and thoroughly conveys the same information as other reliable sources. The sources used to build the article draft are current and up to date, with the oldest article published in 2015. But, the information acquired from the source: Al-Ezzi, Athil S.; Ansari, Mohamed Nainar M. (2022). "Photovoltaic Solar Cells: A Review". Applied System Innovation. 5 (4): 67. doi:10.3390/asi5040067. ISSN 2571-5577. in that article was actually derived from the article: Kumar, S., Kaur, T. (2014). Solar PV Performance-Issues and Challenges. International Journal of Innovative Research in Electrical, Electronics, Instrumentation and Control Engineering, 11(2), 2168-2172. This does not mean that the article cited cannot be used, it just cannot be used to cite that specific information. The article already provided by the user can still be used to expand on additional information presented in the article draft, considering it is a recent and reputable source. Each article in the draft was written by different authors, and are independent of each other but convey similar information, and overall aid in article improvement. All links to the existing articles work upon checking. The provided sources supplement the information well, but making the suggested changes mentioned would further improve the article draft.

Organization
The article draft is well organized, and has defined subsections. To further improve the article, adding relevant information to the subsections would allow for better organization of the article. When inserting citations, remember to put the period following the last word of the sentence, not after the citation (ex. current: ...batteries[1]. Change to: ...batteries.[1]). An additional suggestion to improve the article draft would include cutting down on the number of subsections following the lead, and cover a few of the main components of the topic thoroughly, rather than many sections with limited information. As well, within the references section, by applying the wikipedia template an automatic citation list should appear. This reduces the need for inserting the full citation and thus they can be removed.

Images and Media
No images were added in the article draft. There are images in the article already to provide users with a better understanding of the information in the article, so including an image of what a typical solar car looks like would further improve the draft.

Overall Impressions
Overall, the article draft was well composed. The content added would be relevant to the original article, and would aid in the improvement of it by providing a new section that correlates to the topic. As stated previously, the existing content is good, but can be further improved by building upon the information already in the draft, including the lead, and a few of the defined subsections.