User:Ezpzii/Reductive amination/JustAnotherInternetUser Peer Review

General info
Ezpzii, Rmchar
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Ezpzii/Reductive amination
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Reductive amination

Evaluate the drafted changes
There was already a Lead and a few other sections, which were not modified, but a good amount was added, and it seemed to fit the rest of the article, keeping the structure it already had. You should make a smaller header under their main reaction process section to indicate you are comparing about direct and in direct reductive amination instead of just having an image and starting the discussion. Iridium (3) should be written as Iridium (III). You should add hyperlinks throughout the writing for example when writing SN 2 type reactions. Each section had a good amount of information in them and they were easy to follow and straight to the point. You had a good variety of sources and added a good amount of relevant information.