User:Ezpzii/Reductive amination/Thanhthe3200 Peer Review

General info
Rmchar, Ezpzii
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ezpzii/Reductive amination
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Reductive amination

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The writers haven't worked on their Lead yet.

Content and Organization

- The writers did a great job in adding the good amount of information with a clear flow and good organization. The numbered list is excellent.

- The content is up-to-date.

Tone and Balance

- The tone is neutral. The writers don't have any claims that are heavily biased.

Sources and References

- The writers' references are from reliable sources.

- The writers properlymade the bibliography and in-text citation format.

Images and Media

- The writers have not worked on images and tables yet, but they suggest the possible reaction scheme.

- Considering adding reaction scheme may help the Variations and related reactions section.

Overall impression

- In conclusion, the writers have made good changes for the articles. The amount of information added is impressive.

- More references can improve the reliability of the information, but generally, the writers did a great job in researching for this project.

- Adding reaction scheme and tables may help the text-heavy sections.