User:FCollins95/Sex reversal/Emwallac Peer Review

General info
FCollins95
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:FCollins95/Sex reversal:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nutritional_epigenetics&action=history
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Sex reversal

Evaluate the drafted changes
As I was viewing the sandbox draft of the article that you are reviewing, it was very organized with the plans that are made to improve the article.

As the article draft portion hasn't been edited yet, I believe that you all are off to a great start with the outline provided for each section of the article.

Good job with the links that were added to the article, for they are visible to the reader when clicked on. (3 edits done to the article)

The tone of the article is neutral but there could be a little more added information in some sections of the article to elaborate on the information provided. This might be confusing to someone who does not have any background knowledge on the topic. Incorporating some more links to certain terms will help the reader to understand the information a little better.

The "In birds" section of the article can use a little more information to elaborate on the topic's discussion and how it is relevant to birds.

The last link provided in the section, "In mammals", could probably resemble the same type of link as the others do in the listing. considering that they are scientific names which might not be reader friendly to all possible readers.

When I viewed the history on the article, I noticed that only the links were added to the article, so like stated before, good job and just continue to work on the edits that you all plan to do in the sandbox.