User:FT2/DecAdds

Contact Us; NPOV, V and OR (from OR); WP:LEGAL and this thread; Confidential evidence and this thread, geology of EU. Artificial Leather/Nauga/Naugahyde, NPA

ToChk: meta:RTV, confidential ev, OTRS wiki boilerplates section, contact us section, clean up kw.user:*.*, eagle ANI searcher bug, lancing pics, jayvdb obits? general disclaim, Duro arb-talk prop., HAIs (Healthcare-Associated infections) -> MRSA

Cases - Regis Silva

Durova #3 and arb norms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Neutral_point_of_view/Archive_29#WP:ASF

list of "common neutrality errors", also referred to by: AldeBaer 09:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

? Deor, HildanKnight

AmbiguousBio

WT:CSD

Veropedia

neutrality work - Brabara Schwarz, Andrew Regan

Arb pages

Clarification, extension, and motions in prior cases
Closed cases may be revisited in three ways:


 * A request for clarification may be made for any point that is not clear, or which may have unexpected side-effects if implemented as written.
 * A review or extension of ruling may be requested if the ruling was inadequate, or needs updating to take account of subsequent events.
 * A motion in a prior case may be sought if a ruling was made, and it is hoped the ruling can be set aside.

Standing of Arbitration decisions
Arbcom rulings reflect present policies and norms; unless explicitly stated they should not be taken either to create new policy, or change existing ones, although they can reconcile conflicting norms.

No arbitration ruling should be construed as to prevent or otherwise hinder the development of new policies or the changing of old policies, unless the committee has made a specific declaration to the contrary.