User:FT2/Snips

Standard texts

 * {| style="border:black solid 1px" width="85%"


 * Blocking policy:
 * Blocking policy:


 * "A user may be blocked when necessary to protect the rights [...] of [users]... A block for protection may be necessary in response to: [...] persistently making personal attacks ."


 * "A user may be blocked when his or her conduct severely disrupts the project; that is, when his or her conduct is inconsistent with a civil, collegial atmosphere and interferes with the process of editors working together harmoniously to create an encyclopedia. A block for disruption may be necessary in response to: ... persistent gross incivility ; ... edit warring or revert warring ; ... persistently violating other policies or guidelines, where there is a consensus among uninvolved users that the violation is disruptive."


 * "The duration of blocks should thus be related to the likelihood of a user repeating inappropriate behavior. Longer blocks for repeated and high levels of disruption is to reduce administrative burden ; it is under presumption that such users are likely to cause frequent disruption or harm in future . Administrators should consider: ... the severity of the behavior; whether the user has engaged in that behavior before ."


 * }

user X breached the bright line rule WP:3RR which is there to dampen and curtail revert warring no manner whether right or wrong and replace it by dispute resolution. She responded to declination by making the following personal attacks [Y][Z].

[...Accordingly I concur with the block, and in the circumstances and, given the [(link) previous record] of blocks for harassment, incivility that had already been escalated somewhat past the minimal 24 hours, I concur that a week's block is an appropriate use of judgement.]
 * }