User:FabeCoronado/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Propaganda

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It relates to what I have been discussing in com 520, with Facebook. Bias information is direct correlation.

Evaluate the article
The article opens up directly acknowledge what the rest of it will be made up of. It tells you right away what Propaganda is and get its out of the way so it can go into a much deeper look into what it is an the history of it. Although it does not exactly include a brief description of major components of the article it is very concise and straight forward, yet effective in the right way. The information in it is up to date and accurate, the information you get from reading it is relevant and helpful when looking for information on this topic. I cannot say that there is information missing, but perhaps some information that you can do without, or at least shorten some sections of the article. This article does not try to persuade you on anything it is neutral and gives off the energy that it is simply providing accurate information on what is being discussed. It is an article backed by good reliable references and sources and is complete with citations that are needed. Many sources are included. It is a clear, clean, easy to read piece that is written well. The organization is one of the keys to it being easy to read. Grammatical errors are not easy to spot if there are any. It includes great images that enhance the reading experience and it also has captions with accurate and detailed information that takes it to the next level of learning. Overall the article is very accurate and worth a read. The strengths are the relevant information and how organized it is, the weaknesses is that it can be a bit more concise and can use some more meat at the start of it.

I wonder how you can improve this article by introducing ideas that you're learning about this semester --Renee Hobbs