User:Fable1119/Mata Menge/Emilie.meza Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

fable1119


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fable1119/Mata_Menge?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mata Menge

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Overall, they could add a bit more information and they could add more detail to the content they already have. Great starting off base :)

Lead

They do not have the writing in sentences yet, more in the format of bullet points. They do include details and descriptors that are not in the article already and much of the information added is in its base language. They should add more descriptors to the information. The information is neither concise or detailed but it can be noted that they have left themselves reminders to add more detail.

Content

The content is relevant to the topic and the cited sources show that it the information added is from 2006+. I think they could add a bit more information but they have a great starting off point.

Tone and Balance

The content added has been neutral. Nothing appears to he heavily biased towards a position.

Sources and References

All the new content is backed up by resources and cited sources. The sources seem relatively current, there is one from 2006 but the rest are 2010+. The sources do have multiple authors so they have different perspectives added. None of them have the ability to click and it takes me to the source, I do have to type them into google.

Organization

The content is still in its beginning stages because they have not put it into sentence/paragraph form but so far it has no grammatical or spelling errors.

Images and Media

No images or media added.