User:Faith.barnhill/Extensive reading/Elsen.gregory Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Faith Barnhill


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Faith.barnhill/Extensive reading
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Hi Faith, I just finished reading your sandbox and it looks like you are off to a strong start.

When reading your lead section, I thought your introduction to the term extensive reading was clear and easy to follow, especially with the contrast to intensive reading. I am not sure if this is the whole lead section for the article, and if that is the case, I think you should also include an overview of the sections included, but if not, then it seems okay.

Your content seems clear and relevant here in terms of defining the purpose of extensive reading. However, I found myself asking if this is only a teaching strategy or if there if this is a term that applies to anyone reading in this manner? When you actually discuss the source from the extensive reading foundation, I am not sure how closely you quoted them here, but this may be a case that you have close paraphrasing that may need to be put more into your own language.

Finally, there are some typos in the second half of your second paragraph that you should take a look at.

Greg