User:Faith211/Fashion design/Bellaespinoza2021 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Faith 211)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Article

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * yes it introduces the topic well
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * yes it does include sub sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * no
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * some parts have little detailed but overall pretty good.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * yes most talk about fashion
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * most are
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * not that I saw most is good

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * yes there can't really be sides for this topic. most was neutral
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * yes they were all from secondary source.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * the ones that I checked yes.
 * Are the sources current?
 * yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * they are pretty diverse. Not so sure they include historically marginalized individuals.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * yes it is very organized and easy to read
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Not that I saw. No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes it is well organized

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No, no images were included.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * No images were included
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * There were no Images
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * No images

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

my article wasn't new.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * yes i think it added more new information.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * I Think the new sources.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * images, since it is fashion. Pictures would definitely help.