User:Falcon2023/Toyota/FoldingClient97 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Falcon2023


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Falcon2023/Toyota


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Toyota

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead is very well constructed and provides new information that is not present in the current article. The lead to this article is also very concise with important information that will be addressed throughout the article.

Content: The content in the article was up to date and relevant to the discussion of Toyota and climate change. The article does not represent a historically underrepresented population or topic.

Tone and Balance: The tone and balance of this article is very neutral and does not include any particular sense of bias on Toyotas effects on climate change. The article seems to highlight new ways Toyota is addressing climate change problems and how they are becoming a ore environmental friendly company.

Organization: The article was organized very well and broke each new topic of information into its own section which was very appealing to me as a reader. Each section is also clearly constructed making the organization of this article very good.

References: The sources and references were cited perfectly and had a high number of respected sources that the writer pulled information from.

Overall Impression: Overall I believe this was a very well written article that had good structure filled in with strong information. This addition to the Toyota article will improve the article overall. Focusing on Toyotas new innovations seem to fit as a path to go down in this article