User:False Prophet/Rfa criteria

Edits
Quality edits is defined as the following:


 * Mainspace: VP, creation, non-minor, clean up, adding sources and refs, adding quality info
 * Talk:Article discussion about content or ideas, straw poll creation or vote
 * User Page: 50-100 edits, determined at my discression on a case by case basis
 * User talk: warnings, welcome notes, questions related to articles, or invites
 * Wikipedia: all non-minor edits; Wikipedia Talk: most edits to this portion are quality edits
 * Portal: all non-minor edits
 * Portal Talk: anything on topic is a huge boost.
 * Minor edits are nice and helpful, but an admin should be an active editor that makes normal edits daily.

Membership

 * Mediation commitee and ArbComm membership helps alot.
 * Esperanza membership for a reasonable amount of time can be a decision maker on close canidates.
 * VP is almost a necessity
 * Admins should be active in Wikiprojects. They should have membership to a few and be making a lot of contributions

Not admin worthy actions

 * Blocked within the past 3 months
 * subject of an ArbComm case due to behavior
 * WP:CIVIL violations

Article status

 * Have participated in 5 GAN's
 * Have participated in 10 FAC's
 * Have Voted in 5 FAC's
 * Have written at least 1 article

Miscellani
of which:
 * Have voted in 10 Deletion debates
 * 2 must be AFD
 * either the canidate should have participated in every deletion debate category, or have 3 in one deletion category other than afd.
 * should have intermediate html and wikimarkup skills