User:Familyfare/Wari Empire/EcholsI Peer Review

General info
Crutchfieldc
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Familyfare/Wari Empire
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Wari Empire

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

This article highlights topics of statehood we've discussed in class. It talks briefly about the complex scale of the empires reach across the area. The article points out the advance infrastructure and social interactions the Wari had. I was impressed by the section the draft wanted to add to the main article: "Debate on "empire" label" and "Political relations" had the most intriguing information. This article embedded a lot of links to certain topics that I wasn't familiar with which was very helpful. The tone of the article was neutral which is positive. It doesn't take one side more than other.

If I were to improve on the article draft, I would include more citation for the evidence provided and maybe other perspective on the Wari peoples. There could definitely be more sources added to the article. Introducing more photos and maps could also be really useful in the article.

If I were to add some things to my article from review the Wari article is the topic on public relations. This article talk about how the wari interacted with other native nations in the area, and I can introduce this into my article by talking about how the Chickasaw interacted with people other than European settlers.