User:FamousMonster13/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Netflix

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I have a good amount of common knowledge about Netflix, and I think it will be interesting to learn a lot more about it. Netflix is a huge corporation which will obviously have some effect on climate change and sustainability. My preliminary impression of this is that the data consumption is high and with that at the places Netflix runs from the building must be kept to code temperature and more to keep the technology working correctly I believe initially.

Evaluate the article
Netflix's wiki page has a lot of good qualities with a few shortcomings. the lead section is perfect it shows a new reader what Netflix is in the first sentence what they need to know in the first paragraph and a deeper understanding in the first section. for the content the article has a lot of it, however where it lacks is a sustainability section. there is a lot of info on the company distributions and sections, however not a lot on their carbon footprint or effects on sustainability or even on how they try to improve their systems to avoid climate harming. the tone and balance of the article is good as well, there is no point that I saw form my overlook that show that there is any opinions in this article. everything seems very fact based and driven. for the sources and references, from what i can see there are more news articles than scientific articles and secondary sources, form what I can tell from my brief overview. this article could probably use more peer-reviewed and more reliable articles. next to address is organization and writing quality, this section is also good, the writing is well written and clear/easy to understand. there are many good breakdowns of idea and sections are well organized and explained. for images and media i have noticed some sections have pictures but not all sections, and the pictures are not entirely memorable, for instance when i got to this evaluating part I thought to my self "I don't think i see any pictures" but then when i went back i realized are some scatted among the article. however the pictures that are there are well captioned and placed, and there are also graphs showing data put in the article as well, which is great. lastly, there is the talk page. here we can see that Netflix is involved in 11 wiki projects. of which 1 is of top importance, there are 3 of high-importance, 2 of mid-importance, 2 of low-importance, and 1 which is not ranked for importance. Netflix is rated C-class overall. however there is not a lot on the talk page. only one edit and my soon to be edits, something labeled (wiki education NAS 348 Global Climate Change). overall after evaluating this article I am happy with my choice i think this is a quality article for me to wok on. I have found what I want to do to this article (add a sustainability section). and there is a lot for me to go off of in this article if needed. there are sections which could be improved but overall it is a good article.