User:Fan Qi7/Justina Blakeney/Jpark111 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Fan Qi's Justina Blakeney


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fan%20Qi7/Justina_Blakeney?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * 2) "so she could stay in Italy" seems irrelevant to her page. Also, I believe there is a pre-existing wikipedia page on her?
 * 3) Perhaps a sub section in the body- about her book?
 * 4) "At the same time, her book series provides readers with practical advice from the book" - the practicality of it could be debated, and "at the same time" is unnecessary. Also, grammatical errors
 * 5) Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * 6) From the information given, I believe that this article is relatively neutral besides the information from her own blog.
 * 7) Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * 8) I think there is definitely more information that could be added such as a list of her collaborations, a shortened list of her products,
 * 9) Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * 10) * Yes, and yes
 * 11) Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * 12) Some information is based on autobiographical blog posts- I am not sure if they are considered a "reliable refernence". (i.e. source [4])
 * 13) Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * 14) None seem out of date.
 * 15) Just some more information on her.