User:Farhansher/Sina plans to attack WP : Thread 4

Salam & peace to all

'Plz dont delete these pages. They are a part of evidence. For more information see talk:Islam, & help us resolve this problem. Thanks for your cooperation .'

Regards

wikipedia

Faith Freedom International Forum Index -> Comments on Current Affairs View previous topic :: View next topic Author Message dsj

Joined: 02 Apr 2005 Posts: 184

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 7:48 am   Post subject: wikipedia

Look at the wikipedia article for saladin, it's all the crusaders' fault. Always it's the crusaders provoked him and made him to fight. Are the people at wikipedia leftists? Back to top munira

Joined: 05 Mar 2005 Posts: 891

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:01 am   Post subject:

its basically such that anyone can go edit it. You can add another paragraph about your point of view. Back to top dsj

Joined: 02 Apr 2005 Posts: 184

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:06 am   Post subject:

munira wrote: its basically such that anyone can go edit it. You can add another paragraph about your point of view. so all of those people have the same views? People seem to have the same distorted views in history just as in today's politics. Back to top munira

Joined: 05 Mar 2005 Posts: 891

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:07 am   Post subject:

dsj wrote: munira wrote: its basically such that anyone can go edit it. You can add another paragraph about your point of view. so all of those people have the same views? People seem to have the same distorted views in history just as in today's politics.

every view of history is a bit distorted Back to top dsj

Joined: 02 Apr 2005 Posts: 184

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:11 am   Post subject:

munira wrote: dsj wrote: munira wrote: its basically such that anyone can go edit it. You can add another paragraph about your point of view. so all of those people have the same views? People seem to have the same distorted views in history just as in today's politics.

every view of history is a bit distorted If you look at a defensive conflice like the crusades it will tell you that the crusaders were barbarians. But if you look at an offensive one like the mongols, it will tell you that the mongols were heroic warriors and somehow it's the european's fault for the mongol invasion. Back to top Frodo Baggins

Joined: 07 Mar 2004 Posts: 2847 Location: Dar ul-Bacon Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:17 am   Post subject: Re: wikipedia

dsj wrote: Are the people at wikipedia leftists?

Some articles are very good, some are clrearly biased. You can add your own view if you want to. Perhaps we should have an FFI team to submit information at Wikipedia? Many people use it. _________________ Do you know of any good links about Islam? Suggest them to me for the Internet Toolbox for Islam-critics, and inform me about links not working. Back to top dsj

Joined: 02 Apr 2005 Posts: 184

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:50 am   Post subject:

which one about history would you consider a good one? Back to top zer0degrees

Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 1286 Location: Cosmic Castaway Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 9:15 am   Post subject:

Yeah, I was looking over the Wikipedia articles earlier. They have a section on 'Genocide in History', and a subsection of Ancient Genocides. Can you believe that the 60-70 Million Hindu's killed by Islam isn't there?!! _________________ The Only Good Muslim is a Bad Muslim Back to top Frodo Baggins

Joined: 07 Mar 2004 Posts: 2847 Location: Dar ul-Bacon Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:06 am   Post subject:

dsj wrote: which one about history would you consider a good one?

Well, I remember a decent one about the "yellow star" used by the Nazis for Jews, where they showed clearly that it originated in the Islamic world. _________________ Do you know of any good links about Islam? Suggest them to me for the Internet Toolbox for Islam-critics, and inform me about links not working. Back to top Wodan82

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Posts: 315

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:04 pm   Post subject:

About Wikipedia I can tell you one thing about the dutch language version. There seems to be a network of mostly leftwingers there who are activly working to edit articles about many subjects. Islam is one of them. I discoverd this when I was looking more closey at some writers/editors of articles about a different subject. Back to top dsj

Joined: 02 Apr 2005 Posts: 184

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:32 pm   Post subject:

Wodan82 wrote: About Wikipedia I can tell you one thing about the dutch language version. There seems to be a network of mostly leftwingers there who are activly working to edit articles about many subjects. Islam is one of them. I discoverd this when I was looking more closey at some writers/editors of articles about a different subject. do they tell you who wrote which one? Back to top munira

Joined: 05 Mar 2005 Posts: 891

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:47 pm   Post subject:

I once remember, under "stoning" entry for wikipedia, I once put up a link of 2 people being stoned to death...it was from apostates of islam. They promptly removed it. Even though< i didn't put hte video up, but just a link saying," if you wanna look at how people are stoned to death, feel free to look at the video" Back to top dsj

Joined: 02 Apr 2005 Posts: 184

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 1:01 pm   Post subject:

That mongol invasion thing is also misleading. Back to top KAOSKTRL

Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 299

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:49 pm   Post subject:

Wiki is utterly corrupt leftwing islamophiles _________________ join the fight http://kafirnation.com Back to top Wodan82

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Posts: 315

Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 4:04 am   Post subject:

dsj wrote: do they tell you who wrote which one?

'''You need to take a close look at the discussion part of wikipedia and at the indivuadale page's of the differtent contributers. That alows you to make a pretty educated gues.''' Back to top Hume

Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 313

Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 11:57 am   Post subject: Re: wikipedia

dsj wrote: Look at the wikipedia article for saladin, it's all the crusaders' fault. Always it's the crusaders provoked him and made him to fight. Are the people at wikipedia leftists?

Hi dsj, please have look in this thread for tips on editting etc _________________ BAH, Humbug! Back to top farside

Joined: 16 Feb 2004 Posts: 262 Location: The Other Side Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 12:25 pm   Post subject:

Speaking of Wikipeida, I received a private message from a forum member requesting my assistance in starting an anti-Islam archive based on the Wiki software. It was an interesting request on many levels, but I was too busy and too leery to accept such an offer.

Farside Back to top dsj

Joined: 02 Apr 2005 Posts: 184

Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 12:26 pm   Post subject: Re: wikipedia

Hume wrote: dsj wrote: Look at the wikipedia article for saladin, it's all the crusaders' fault. Always it's the crusaders provoked him and made him to fight. Are the people at wikipedia leftists?

Hi dsj, please have look in this thread for tips on editting etc the current thread? Back to top Hume

Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 313

Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 12:29 pm   Post subject: Re: wikipedia

dsj wrote: Hume wrote: dsj wrote: Look at the wikipedia article for saladin, it's all the crusaders' fault. Always it's the crusaders provoked him and made him to fight. Are the people at wikipedia leftists?

Hi dsj, please have look in this thread for tips on editting etc the current thread?

oops forgot to paste: this thread http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5640 _________________ BAH, Humbug! Back to top Wodan82

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Posts: 315

Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 11:42 pm   Post subject: Re: wikipedia

Hume wrote: dsj wrote: Look at the wikipedia article for saladin, it's all the crusaders' fault. Always it's the crusaders provoked him and made him to fight. Are the people at wikipedia leftists?

Hi dsj, please have look in this thread for tips on editting etc

I think you shoud pay some atention to this one : http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overleg:A%EFsja Back to top Hume

Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 313

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 8:21 am   Post subject:

Well pedophilia is still mentioned in the main article as well as the main essence. I haven't been monitoring wikipedia for a while because it can become a tiring efford because of all these pc morons reverting changes:( _________________ BAH, Humbug! Back to top       Ululating Idiota

Joined: 30 May 2005 Posts: 692

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 9:06 am   Post subject:

Wikipedia is actually pretty good. They have a bit of PC, but are frequently honest, too. And allow for debate. _________________ Behold, I am against the prophets, saith HaShem, that steal my words from his neighbor. Behold, I am against the prophets, saith HaShem, that use their own tongues, and say God saith. Back to top dsj

Joined: 02 Apr 2005 Posts: 184

Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 2:40 pm   Post subject:

Wikipedia did not mention the mongol invasion too much. But most of the history forums have extreme Leftists or islamic people there where when you say that europe was militarily stronger, more democratic, and more scientifically advanced than the east in the middle ages or the ancient ages they will start attacking you and using VERY VERY aggressive language. Back to top dsj

Joined: 02 Apr 2005 Posts: 184

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:53 pm   Post subject:

Another thing is that they always decrease the army size and casualty for islam and do the opposite for europe. Back to top KAOSKTRL

Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 299

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 10:11 pm   Post subject:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takfiri

this is a stub if anyone want to work it hanifism is another