User:FatimaSani21/Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2/Hadasam Peer Review

General info
FatimaSani21
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Edits by:

Brandon Shortrede


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:FatimaSani21/Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2
 * Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2

Evaluate the drafted changes
This article has been updated to reflect another topic which is environmental features. The article starts with a sentence that talks about one of the topics discussed but it does not give a general idea of all the topics that are going to be discussed in the article. The article does not include a brief description of the article's major sections. It includes new information that was not present in the article before. It includes environmental features like similarities shown between humans and animals, unrealistic aspects portrayed in movie and weather facts.The lead is concise and could include more environmental features. The aspects discussed are relevant to the topic of environmental features.The article could talk about more of the environmental aspects in the movie. The link used in the first paragraph works but it is the only one provided. The article needs to add more sources with correct citations that make the article more reliable. The information given is from a neutral point of view, The information is not biased and does not show any particular position. The content does not attempt to persuade the reader it just provides information about an underrepresented topic.

The article is concise, well organised and very easy to read.The content is divided into sections that make the information easy to read. It is also easy to locate major topics discussed. It does not have major grammatical errors.The article has not yet included an image that represents the topic. Thee article is very short and could add more information, details or examples. There aren't many sources in the article available in the article. The article could include more citation and sources that back up the information provided. The article improved the articles' quality since it added an interesting topic.The strengths of the article is that it is concise and very easy to read. It gives interesting information but it could give out more. The article need to include more sources that back up the information given with correct citation.