User:Faultrox/sandbox

Article Evaluation for Geology of New England
Chosen article: Geology of the Lassen volcanic area ''The last paragraph in the section on current setting describing nearby mountains seems a bit out of place. Tectonics setting diagram also seems to be in wrong place (should be with section above).'' Not much controversy as far as I can tell Not obviously ''Yes, an example: source 1 cited for early geologic history. The text is a paraphrase of the original.'' ''Note use of roadside geology texts and government websites. Also some textbooks.''
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

2 primary sources (OK?) ''Seems pretty thorough. Might be nice to have a section on the geography rather than mixing some in?'' ''Nothing recent. In 2012 there was some discussion of when the last major eruption ended (1917 or 1921)'' ''Featured Article. Part of Geology, California, Volcanoes'' N/A
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Notes

Figures are not cited in text is this standard?

Note use of internal links

How do pages typically end?