User:Faziom4/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Category:Human sciences

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it relates to my major. Also the article seemed like an interesting read just based off the title. This article matters because human science investigates human life as a whole. The life of a human is extremely important and valuable, so this article truly matters. My preliminary impression of it was that this article was going to be confusing to read and understand.

Evaluate the article
The lead section provides the main message which is of human science. It gives a detailed definition on what human science is. For the content section, the content is up to date, as it was last edited on February of 2024. For tone and balance, the article seems to stay neutral, and is only providing factual information. There is no information that seems to be unnecessary. For sources and references, it seems like there are no secondary sources provided. For organization and writing quality, it seems like this article is well written. The article is short and sweet to the point, and gets its message across clearly and concisely. There are no images that are provided on this page for the article. I believe it does not need images. There is no talk page provided for this article. I think with this topic, having a talk page would have been nice. This article overall was extremely informative. It wasn't too long and wasn't too short. It got its main message off, and allowed for me to learn something new. The only thing I would recommend, is that there should be a talk page.