User:Fb20009/Little Pine First Nation/Colind3607 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Fb20009


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fb20009/Little_Pine_First_Nation?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Little Pine First Nation

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, all of the content pertains to the Little Pine First Nation.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, they mention events from 2020 and 2021.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There was hardly any information on the current wikipedia article, so all of the information was much needed.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes, Natives from America/Canada are very underrepresented.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, the article does a good job of just stating the facts without bias.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, a couple of the sources were from official government websites.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, most of them except a book from 1992.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the article is well written and flows nicely.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? None that I could see.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes there is one image of a map that shows where the Little Pine First Nation is on a grander scale.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes this all much needed information about the Little Pine First Nation that is very barren at the moment.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? It provides a good narrative about the past and present history of the Little Pine First Nation.
 * How can the content added be improved? It is already good right now. :)