User:Fcatauro/Tidal flooding/Cbright6 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Fcatauro, Ahirsch08


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Tidal flooding
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Tidal flooding

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Lead
 * The lead is concise and to the point, with a good summary at the beginning
 * It works well detailing where the article is going, summarizing parts that are elaborated on further in the article
 * Content
 * The content is a bit sparse and could be elaborated on more, for instance in the effected infrastructure part there could be examples in states like the affected geographies part.
 * Sources
 * Every source I tried seemed to work and had info relating to what was in the wiki article
 * Most of the content though does not have sourcing attached
 * Organization
 * The organization seems good
 * images and media
 * The media works well with the text and helps explain and visually show certain parts of what the article is trying to elaborate on