User:Feignedexistence/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
David Goggins

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Goggins is awesome, he matters because he is an example of unrelenting will, the article was well written and goes over his life in broad strokes citing things.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

In his career section there are not many citations. I do suppose that can be expected since the Navy generally does not release information about their operators' identities or past and would usually keep this information classified. So that section is cited from an interview with him. There is a standing notability discrepancy on his page, most of the information is relevant. The bits about Jessie Itzler and his own books should be in a different part of the article, likely under career. Every link In checked works and it is easy to read. The article does not have bias. There are images and they are helpful. There has been recent scrutiny in the talk page as his article is in a wiki edu classroom.