User:Fernandesi/Lake Fryxell/Klikata Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Fernandesi


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Lake Fryxell


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lake Fryxell

Evaluate the drafted changes
NEW PEER REVIEW

Sorry I must have peer reviewed the published page!

You can definitely include some more specific information and images about your lake within the article. It gets right into the ecology where you talk about oxygen and zone. As a reader, it would be easier to get into this article by starting out with some basic information and background about the lake.

I like the different subsections you have within the article, but not a lot of detail within the subsections. You mention a study that you looked into. You could describe this study and the findings from it in more depth than you do now. Each section just seems very short and you mention species present. You could describe more what section is about and importance of that section within this lake.

Otherwise, you just need more content. I woild do a background section of basic information regarding location, climate, watershed area. I also would try to get a picture.