User:Fernbush/Elsie Ward/Sarita3940 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Fernbush
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Fernbush/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, the lead is definitely stronger as it mentions more about thanks so much! artists work which is the most crucial part of her story.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes it does. Maybe it could potentially contain more detail.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * It could use this
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is almost too concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Thanks so much!e sources are great as they are from a variety of reliable sources like museums, national societies, dissertations, and presses.
 * Are the sources current?
 * yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * no
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * yes it was a great addition to a practically bear article before

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * the added information was necessary and very helpful to the almost completely blank article before
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * As mentioned above, maybe adding more pictures or descriptions of her work in detail or a section about styles and influences. The article was very strong and these are just ideas. There was nothing that needed major editing

Overall evaluation
very good. impressive by how much it added and shocking to see such a blank original article. I would give a great grade

I also was wondering if she took her husbands name and if that means she should be referred to by that after her marriage is mentioned? it obviously will be decided by whether or not she