User:Feydey/Talk archive 7

user:SKRIBUL
Hey,

Soz dude thats my page its just that I'm not logged in :) 86.129.255.108 23:28, 31 December 2006 (UTC) & SKRIBUL 23:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

thanks
Thanks for removing the vandalism from my page.  S h a r k f a c e  2 1 7  01:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Your revert to User:Kamope
When you reverted the background on my userpage, you thought someone else did it. An IP did it. That was my IP. I'm sorry you thought another user did it. :-) Kamope 14:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)


 * My userpage is now semi-protected, so only logged in users can edit it. :-) Kamope | userpage | talk  |  contributions 22:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Catholic-expand
Template:Catholic-expand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --Stbalbach 22:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

RfA
Hello. I have decided to nominate you for a position as an admin. (Requests for adminship/Feydey). Looking through your edits, I believe you would be a fine admin, and hopefully you will accept the nom. -- Wizardman 19:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC) If you wish to accept, the discussion can be found here.  Wizardman would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Wizardman to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
 * Alright then. If you accept later on then let me know. I'm sure I'll find out though. And the RfA I write about is an admin request :P, as evident by my apparent double-linking. -- Wizardman 19:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yup. Happened to click watchlist right when you finished it. -- Wizardman 00:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment
it is i cusser, keep Eth Bombo up or else i won't stop! Even if you do block me i will just create a new account! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cusser (talk • contribs)

My Bad
I didn't realize I was logged out. I am changing my username for I cannot remember my password and have no email in Wikipedia. I will transfer my userpage and discussion to the new user. 70.105.183.51 04:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you...
...for reverting my userpage! Totnesmartin 12:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006
The January 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations
You're now an admin. Have fun using the shiny new tools to help the project keep improving. Sorry I missed 00:00, but I got caught up in a couple things. In any case keep up the good work, re-read the policy as necessary, and try to diffuse situations rather than escalating them. Using the tools conservatively can help. Again, congrats. - Taxman Talk 00:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Congrats and good luck man. :-) ← A NAS ''' Talk? 01:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Congratulations! Have fun being an admin! Kamope | userpage | talk  |  contributions 02:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Congrats! The JPS talk to me  17:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

multimachine1.jpg
I now have a copyright clearance for this image. I will be uploading it again.

Nils Davis 03:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Corrections
Well spotted - I palm the task of delivery off to a very helpful man with a "bot" so I had mentioned it to him, saw the delivery had happened and then forgotten it. As I say again well spotted. How are things going at WP:BK by the way. :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page) / (Desk)  12:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Punjabi gurmukhi shahmukhi.png
I restored the nsd tag on Image:Punjabi gurmukhi shahmukhi.png. Please see the talk page for my rationale. --Iamunknown 07:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Oden
I saw your note on User talk:Oden about db-i7 being innappropriate. I am not sure if you are aware, but the images Oden tagged are currently up for IFD:. Cburnett 16:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Nevermind, I missed that Oden tagged each one with IFD. Anyway, uh, there's a pretty link for you. :) Cburnett 16:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue
thiese pics were taken from the flickr site and it clearly says there "This photo is public" so i had put an appropriate tag there.so whats the copyright issue 7day 09:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

St Nicholas' Church, Kenilworth
I have seen your changes to one of the images here. There is no overall effect to the page presentation. I downloaded the image, improved it and uploaded it with a new name. Is there a better way of doing digital image improvements to an image that is already on a page? Snowman 16:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Image name needs changing

 * Can you change the name of the Image:DSCF3286.JPG to a descriptive name, it is actually meant to be called "Baginton Castle in 2003", although the new editor uploaded it and called it Finham Castle on this summary, I am going on the date on his camera stamp. I guess that only administrators can do this.  I did not upload this image I have been trying to help a new "user:Neil Reid".  I am not sure if he has found his talk page yet.  I think that he is interesting in contributing images to the wiki. Are you on the welcoming committee?  I wonder if you could welcome him or suggest someone on the welcoming committee who would welcome him. Snowman 17:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:BBC-one-ident-selection.jpg
Hi. Thank you for notifying me about the image. However, I tagged the image myself as orphaned fair use on the 8th of January 2007. It should really have been deleted by now. Wikiwoohoo 18:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Error in deletion
Good day. You deleted an article called ERA Cyprus due to copyright infringment. However, this was an error on your part, as ERA Cyprus is part of ERA and therefore can not infringe on copyright as it belongs to ERA Cyprus which is part of the ERA franchise.

Could you please add the article back, this may be confirmed with anyone at ERA by email or telephone.

Thanks for looking out for our interest though. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eracyprus (talk • contribs) 20:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC).

Orphaned fair use image (Image:TGCredits.jpg)
Um, did you even bother to note that said image links leads to a blank page? It's a completely redundant post informing of media deleted by someone else. --293.xx.xxx.xx 22:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Sangean shortwave radio
Why did you delete the image I uploaded of a Sangean shortwave radio (from the article about Sangean)? I got that from an eBay ad of someone who was selling their radio, and before I uploaded it, I wrote an e-mail to the seller, asking him if I could upload his image to the Wikipedia, and he said okay. The image was never copyrighted, and the guy who took the picture already gave me his permission to upload it.

Marknagel 11:21, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

justin wilcomes entry
i do not under stand why you would delete a page that i had permission to make? he is mentioned in numerous other articles and deserved to have a page as well.

cheers andy.

List of Newspapers change
added Mafia_godfather 12:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

for the article "List of Newspapers", why do you restore Taiwan(Republic of China)? I think the article is simply a list of newspapers around the world, and there is really no need to put ROC behind Taiwan since most of the world recognize Taiwan already. It will actually eliminate the confusion of two "Chinas". Secondly, the world adopts the One China Policy of PRC as the only legitimate China of the world, it would be politically incorrect to put ROC up there since the UN Resolution 2758 has already replaced ROC's legal representation with PRC. And finally, neither ROC's constitution nor international laws state that the ROC possesses the sovereignty of Taiwan. It is much better we just leave "Taiwan" the way it is, that way, you do not upset the Chinese for creating another China and the Taiwanese for imposing a foreign trustee government as the owner of their territorial sovereignty. Finally, I see you did not put "Republic of Korea" for S. Korea and "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" for N. Korea... why ROC for Taiwan? It's unecessary.

Favorite Admins
Come on over and place your sig in this list and make a copy of the tools I have. Martial Law 21:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Image deleted
Execuse me! why you deleted the image of 109263240 6fdde25e9c o.jpg as it fulfills the usage and licence requirements?--Alfeewusy 10:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Notification of a discussion regarding at the policy village pump
As you were directly invovled with the confusion surrounding Image:Punjabi gurmukhi shahmukhi.png, I feel obligated to notify you of a discussion I initiated at the policy village pump regarding and the image use policy. Please come offer your opinions on the matter. --Iamunknown 01:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

hmmm
Your Wikipedia Site is Full of bull Shits...

What wrong with that.... Only need money donation>>>?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niffyed (talk • contribs)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:SamanthaFox.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:SamanthaFox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

user:Kingbeem
My article Luxury & Exclusive Croatia was deleted because not following the rules of Wikipedia. OK. I respect that. Your site, your rules. I will try harder to put description in an encyclopedic manner, but trying to find examples how to do it, in the category that I mean to put my article Travel Websites I can not find much articles that are not like advertisements. Look at this for instance: Farecast My deleted article was much “encyclopedic manner” than this. What to do? Thank you, Kingbeem

unspecif source
Image:Margitsziget-1905-Meyers-Lexikon3.jpg

as you can see the source is in the name Meyers Lexikon 1905

this is > 100 years old. Tamas Szabo 07:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Help over at CAT:CSD
Hi, and congrats on your promotion! Per this discussion, I'm dropping a friendly note to some of the recently-promoted admins requesting help with speedy deletions. I am not an administrator, so if you don't feel comfortable diving into deletions - or if you need more info - please don't come to me, but I'm sure that Cyde Weys would be happy to guide you if you want to help. Any help is great, but I'm sure that Cyde and others would deeply appreciate it if you could put the page on your watchlist and do a bit of work there on a regular basis? Maybe weekly? Thanks in advance! Anchoress 18:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Feydey, I'm kinda new to wiki-ing thanks for removing the wiki images if they are a problem.

If I take my own photos and upload them will that be ok ? and what do i list as their permissions etc?

ty Veed

Business process outsourcing South africa

why was it necessary to redirect this ?

Deleting images from Military of Myanmar article
Can you please leave proper reasoning for deleting the images from the article on talk page? You seems to be deleting without any reason. Unless you provide proper reasons and citaions, next time I will be forced to report you. Okkar 21:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Novels newsletter : Issue IX - February 2007
The February 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 17:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hey Feydey,

I just would like to thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 54/13/11. I appreciate the trust expressed by members of the community, and will do my best to uphold it.

Naturally, I am still becoming accustomed to using the new tools, so if you have suggestions or feedback, or need anything please let me know. - Gilliam 21:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Unprotecting articles
If you see a message in the protection log that says something like "libel concerns" or "BLP concerns", as in Bentley School, this usually means that the Wikimedia Foundation has received e-mail concerning these articles from the subject of them, sometimes containing legal threats, and the article should not be unprotected after a mere month. —Centrx→talk &bull; 16:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Expandable Articles
Hi, there's a discussion on what to do with expandable articles here. As you've discussed this before I would appreciate comments. JASpencer 18:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi Nice that you are interested in microbiology. I have added some changes to your stub about biohydrometallurgy. /Anna.h.bauer

Hi

Nice that microbiology interests you. I have added some material to the stub on Biohydrometallurgy.

--Anna.h.bauer 14:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi again, Concerning the biohydrometallurgy page I just wonder in what way those comments that I recently included need a source any more than those that are already there? One of the paragraphs that you removed is my own statement after reading loads of articles on the subject. The other one did have a source - I named it in italics. Exactly what are you missing?

Deletion
How come my article was deleted Thomas Wales —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheGeniusTom (talk • contribs) 18:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC).
 * It was a non-notable biography article about a person that does not assert the notability of the subject. feydey 18:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Thomas Wales
Wikipedia is about telling people about People, Items, etc. Famous or not Famous.

--TheGeniusTom 18:16, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

thanks for the help. i'm still figuring out how to use things correctly. think i have correct copyright statements in now for Molly Hyde jpg

molly hyde
thanks for the help, i'm still figuring things out. think copyright info is correct now for jpg, etc —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Moviesss (talk • contribs) 19:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC).

How to get an article to DYK (Did You Know...)
Greetings and Salutations from central asia.

I've been trying to spruce up the Sayram article. Internet speeds are horrendous here, and it seems there's always something else to fix or reword. I'm doing my best to scrutinize my text, but I don't have the practice and full understanding of the format that comes with time.

My main question is: since I just created this article, doesn't that mean that it falls under the main criteria to be mentioned in the "Did you know..." sections on the main page of Wikipedia? I would like a little guidance on thrusting this little article into a big more limelight, if possible.

Public scrutiny is good, right?

Michael Hancock 20:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 22:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me.

It was me who changed the user:shreyasgandlur page. User:shreyasgandlur is me. Please don't revert it back when I delete it. Thanks

Cheers
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Will 23:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Astola image
You removed the image I posted on Astola, which included copyright info this time. Please let me know what I did wrong.

-- Unre4L  ﺍﹸﻧﺮﮮﺍﻝ  UT 15:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The image was licenced for non-commericial use only or only for use on Wikipedia and as such is not proper for Wikipedia and was speedily deleted. See Image copyright tags for available licences. feydey 15:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

pic removed
hi, why did you remeve 2 pics from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alisport_Silent_2_Targa thhks dansco —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dansco2903 (talk • contribs) 16:08, 14 February 2007 (UTC).

What is wrong with you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firemedics1 (talk • contribs)

Shreyasgandlur 22:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page.

List of the Daily Show guests AFD
As a contributor of these lists you may wish to vote: Articles for deletion/List of The Daily Show guests (2nd nomination). Cburnett 01:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Cat:Biographies
I think the consensus of the debate was a renaming to Category:Biographies (books) not Category:Biography books...
 * indeed there were only two submissions that used the 2cd form and one of those appear to prefer the "(books)" format. So what do we doo now! Personally I don't mind but that's not really the point. :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page) / (Desk)  08:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:ACDC banner.jpg
Hey, you said Image:ACDC banner.jpg has no source information, but I specified that I created the image myself. What do i need to do to avoid it being deleted? ĤĶ51→Łalk 09:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, I've uploaded a new version of the banner which is composed of free images. I wasn't sure if I should place the license for each of them on the page, so I just listed the images I used in the summary section. ĤĶ51→Łalk 15:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Biographies
Thanks for the heads up, I appear to have missed that one. I'll fix it.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  11:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Flamenco Sketches
Hello, Feydey. I noticed you edited out my dead links from the Flamenco Sketches page. I'm new to Wikipedia as an author, so it's most likely my own error in uploading those files (or making the attempt to do so). If you could possibly help me figure out how to get my two PDF files in that article, that would be great because they offer much more than just what the words in the article can tell. Anyway, thanks in advance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ezekielvictor (talk • contribs) 20:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC).

Kevin Nash
please restore the info about his racial composition. it was correct. WillC 19:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Warheads image deletion
Why did you delete the image from the Warheads page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Johnfreeman96 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC).
 * It was deleted from wikipedia. feydey 00:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of article "Karlstad Dragons"
Hi there,

I would like to object the deletion based on the notability criteria guideline, where it states: "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of at least one substantial or multiple, non-trivial published works, the source of which is both:

* independent of the company, corporation, organization or group itself, or of the product's or service's manufacturer or vendor, and * reliable."

The organization "Karlstad Dragons", was subject of one substantial, independent and reliable work, on the Swedish Australian Football League - SAFL (www.safl.se) - http://www.safl.se/Site/News/1A757EA8-2748-467B-85D8-6445DE052221.html.

Concerning not being affiliated with a league, I can state that this is only a matter of weeks.

Confident, that this argument will change your mind in deleting the article. Keep up the good work.

Best,

Jörg Joergelp 08:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

"Boris"
Your friend "Boris Allen" has been banned indefinately. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.43.45.201 (talk) 14:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC).

Infobox Book
I notice your modification to the example section of this template. I don't object to the mod - however I might be better if you did a more comprehensive change. i.e. match the sample code with the sample display, and also made the "title" more internally consistent (apply to the same book)! Thanks :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page) / (Desk)  15:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll look at it later. I'll probably put a PD book so the cover matches. feydey 19:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your support on my RfA. It passed with 55/0/0. I'll try my best to be worthy of the trust the community has put in me. If there are any of my actions you have a problem with or a question about, please feel free to discuss this with me and if needed to revert me. If there is anything else I can help you with (backlogs, comments, ...), you can always contact me on my talk page. Fram 14:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - March 2007
The March 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
I'm sorry, but how did me removing items such as "HEY GUYS CALL ME AT (503)566-7064" and other such random information, and "content" someone had pasted in the wrong section (info already in the article) constitute vandalism at Oregon Trail? Please explain? Aboutmovies 04:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I’m a bit disappointed. First, I would expect an admin to first look more carefully, especially when the edit summary was “revert vandalism” before jumping the gun with an icon. Generally, myself, if I go into someone’s talk page/user contribution history and see they have been doing vandalism in general, then and only then will I warn them. But if they look like a regular contributor, then I assume good faith and look and make sure it was vandalism, then I usually still don’t warn them, I just fix the problem and move on. Avoids confrontation with other valid editors.
 * Secondly, when you jump the gun like that it makes legitimate editors get ticked off and not want to bother reverting vandalism like I did a handful of times yesterday. The page in question was repeatedly vandalized and probably has more remnants still there, but I don’t know and I am not going to bother to find out. As it was obvious that everything I removed was vandalism including the duplicate info because it was a vandal who put it there here as a copy and paste from the above area. It is clearly vandalism when you look at the edit history. Then to top everything off, you give me an excuse. I was very reserved yesterday in my response to you. I knew what I had done was not in any way, shape, or form vandalism. What I was expecting from an admin was a sincere apology (no excuses given like please add more to your edit summary) where by you take responsibility for your actions, and then remove the warning you placed with an edit summary to the effect that, oops, I screwed up so other visitors to my talk page don’t think I’m some sort of vandal.
 * But I guess its not entirely your fault as I am severely disappointed in admins in general since none have responded to my request to close out an old merger proposal and my request for semi-protection on another page that was being vandalized several times daily with no other activity but, vandalize followed by reversion, was denied with a comment like not enough vandalism. You know how that translates: keep reverting it for us, your time is not valuable, thanks.
 * I been busy enough trying to get an editor to understand the WP:COI guideline and other important rules at Talk:Lattice Semiconductor. So, thank you for wasting my time here. Aboutmovies 16:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Why Page Removal to user profile
Hey there - quick question why my wikipedia page was removed to my user profile page Mwilfley? My credits are legitimate and should not have been removed. A fellow actor with less credits than I currently has a wikipedia page at : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessie_Pridemore and another actor example is (he has slightly more but is a co-actor on the production I'm in): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Ross

Follow-up would be great - thank you! Let me know if my agency or the production company needs to update this.

Mwilfley, 9 March 2007

Question on picture
Hi, I want to upload a photo that was originally taken in 1926, but I have scanned it from a book published in 2000. It depicts some European colonials in Kenya, just for the record. Is it fair use? Does it fall into a particular category? Thanks in advance. Xanthi22 23:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Chick-fil-A Cow
Can you explain to me why this was deleted? If you're right about this, then I think I have a gross misunderstanding of the Creative Commons license... tiZom(2¢) 20:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Whoops...nevermind. Just realized why it was deleted.  Never knew we didn't accept non-commercial images...thought anything copyleft was acceptable.  My mistake, sorry about that. tiZom(2¢)  20:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

666Satan
hey, idk if your still in2 666Satan much anymore, but i designed a userbox if your interested in using it

above is what it looks like, and the template link for it,

peace,
 * -Ancientanubis 21:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC)