User:Filll/AGF Challenge Reptile-Remove all mention of this extraterrestrial reptile theory


 * 1) -- Naerii  02:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) ~ UBeR (talk) 01:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Too fringe for mainstream articles, but may deserve an article of its own if it's really believed by a significant group of people. *Dan T.* (talk) 00:12, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) But, if there are thousands of websites on it, write an article about extraterrestrial reptile theory, and restrict all references of it to that article.  &rArr;   SWAT Jester    Son of the Defender  23:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Unless reliable sources can be cited. George D. Watson  (Dendodge). Talk Help 12:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Assuming good faith - even for the purposes of this exercise - does not mean "dispose of all common sense and accept any old rubbish". If they keep adding it after polite warnings, block. Neıl  ☎  16:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) WP:UNDUE and WP:RS pretty much prohibit mentioning fringe theories about individuals in their biographies. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Too WP:FRINGE-y to include in individual bios. One main page with outgoing links will suffice. sho  y  16:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) BirdKr (talk) 22:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) The assumption of good faith has its limits.  All hail Diana! BrownHornet21 (talk) 04:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) Remove the allegations. Remove the articles discussing them and salt them. Finally, if the author persists, ban him. --Logical Premise (talk) 19:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) Remove the articles, and apply a salt editing block. GB 86 06:06, 25 June 2010 (UTC)